How does an inexpensive photo editing software program compare to the top-of-the-line Adobe Photoshop? Do you need all of the features of the more expensive program? For comparison, I choose a recent addition to the photo editing line-up, Pixelmator, an England-based software product available for $29.99 from the Mac App Store, and Adobe's Photoshop at about $800. Are you ready to spend days and maybe weeks learning a complex program or do you just need to adjust some photos and add labels and perhaps a description? One way to determine what you need is to try several free programs and then decide if you need a more complex alternative. One thing is certain: to some extent, you get what you pay for in photo editing software.Īs a genealogist, before making a purchase you really need to assess your needs for photo editing software. Whether you use a free program or one with endless features depends on your needs and expectations, as well as your computer skills and patience to learn new features. There are programs that are very basic and limited, and the more expensive programs that have an almost endless variety of features. Last edit at 03:31PM by MitchJi.Photo editing software has a large price spectrum from free to those costing many hundreds of dollars. But at just a few dollars more than Acorn, it’s worth the money just in case you grow into it."Įdited 1 time(s). Of course, not everyone needs all the bells and whistles Pixelmator has to offer. Clair Software’s Default Folder and Titanium’s Software’s Onyx as Mac user favorites. With the developers already working on adding more features, and a very reasonable $59 price tag, it has the promise to join programs like Panic’s Transmit, St. For a Version 1.0 product, Pixelmator is already better than any other image editor outside of Photoshop, and that includes Photoshop Elements. "Pixelmator certainly isn’t for everyone, but, in my opinion, it could easily be for many of us, especially if it evolves quickly and smartly. But, in my three-week test of Pixelmator, I was blown away with its features, speed, stability and utterly stunning good looks." ![]() But I really think it should be compared to Adobe’s Photoshop Elements, if anything.īecause Pixelmator doesn’t yet support CMYK color spaces, Camera RAW formats, drop shadows or any of the other layer effects found in Photoshop (all of which are on the slate for future releases, according to the developers), you can’t really expect to use it on a professional level day-in and day-out. With full support for layers, blend modes, gradients, brushes, metadata and ColorSync, it’s hard not to compare Pixelmator with Photoshop. The obvious comparison is, of course, to Photoshop. ![]() ![]() With over 20 selection tools, 15 color-correction tools, 50 filters, and support for over 100 file formats including PSD, TIF, JPG, EPS and PDF, Pixelmator is poised to fill the void between high-end Photoshop and streamlined editing applications like Acorn. Pixelmator, developed by brothers Saulius and Aidas Dailide, is a fantastic layers-based image editor that uses Apple’s Core Image to work much of its magic. For me, the sweet spot is Pixelmator, which was just released this week. Pixel, on the other hand, tries to do everything, but in my opinion, it fails at an unacceptable number of tasks. One newly released image editor, Acorn, doesn’t go for flash or overloaded features, but its simplicity means that it does its tasks very well. "In the first part of “Image editors for the rest of us,” I covered two programs at opposite ends of the spectrum. Pixelmator sounds good (check this review):
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |